Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major television stations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Clearly vandalism, given the information available. I'm also going to redirect this, as it seems to be a reasonable search term for... well, for something. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Major television stations

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article originally from pt.wiki, where it was discovered recently that the informations were edited by a Brazilian TV station (Google translation). The article was deleted (Google translation) due to this and lack of sources and criteria for inclusion. Translated, was brought to here by the same users who were trying to recreated it on pt.wiki today. viniciusmc 02:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any notable third-party agreement of what "major" means with respect to television stations, so this is original research. Worse, most of the entries in this list are not television stations but networks, and only from a few countries at that. If kept, I think those logos have to go per WP:NONFREE. --NellieBly (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete highly skewed list. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 03:49, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Too highly American-centric, and most of the paragraphs describing each network are just the first few paragraphs of their own articles. Not really needed as many other articles cover the subject in better and much more focused detail.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Crosswiki vandalism that could have been deleted earlier if e administrador were responsible enough to check the damage Rede Globo's employees are causing at pt.wp - and, worst of all, the insertion of original research by them WAS ALREADY CONFIRMED BY A THIRD-PARTY, when the brazilian newspaper "Estado de S.Paulo" notes that they were paying people to insert favorable information in Wikipedia, without no sources. Maddox (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and other !voters.   ArcAngel    (talk) ) 05:50, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.