Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majoran Vivekananthan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Utrop.  MBisanz  talk 20:12, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Majoran Vivekananthan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. Just because he's the editor of an online newspaper doesn't make him notable. Whilst the newspaper has an article in WP I'd say it also has questionable notability LibStar (talk) 18:10, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - local news only; fails WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 09:58, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Utrop - I'm not a Norwegian speaker so I don't know what these sources say but it's best I found, but I'm more convinced to delete as it's unlikely there's independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  17:14, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Utrop - fails WP:GNG.Pincrete (talk) 11:14, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment only, as I am a too seldom user of en-wp to know about rules and standards here. It should be noted though that Utrop is not only an online newspaper, it is also a regularly published paper paper (twice a month). I would say it is a rather visible/audible voice in the Norwegian media world when it comes to matters like immigration, integration and equal opportunities – and has been so for several years. But naturally, if the standard for minor media like this is to merge the editor(s) into the media article, so will be acceptable here, too. Regards, GAD (talk) 12:55, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.