Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majority choice approval (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 21:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Majority choice approval
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Original research. Vanity. This method has neither been published nor used anywhere. See first nomination and second nomination. Yellowbeard 10:07, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Keep NOT Original research. No evidence this method has ever been used, but it has been published. --Fahrenheit451 00:33, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * This method has neither been published nor used anywhere. There is not a single Google book result. And all Google hits refer to Wikipedia mirrors or mailing lists. It is quite obvious that this article is original research. Yellowbeard 10:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The fact that only two users participate at this AfD exemplifies the complete lack of notabiliy of this article. Yellowbeard 12:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.