Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mak Tower


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete qualifies for speedy-delete. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Mak Tower

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested WP:PROD. Fails WP:GNG, an "article" of just seven words about a project that never got off the ground. Donnie Park (talk) 13:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The building was never constructed. Subject is far from being notable. Meatsgains (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sources to indicate notability. And unless the fact that construction was never finished was notable in the news, there is no encyclopedic value to this article. GabeIglesia (talk) 14:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Notability of the construction's failure cannot be verified since there are no sources covering it. Meatsgains (talk) 01:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy/Snow Delete: This should've been CSD A7'd. Completely non-notable, WP:CRYSTALBALL, WP:NOT, et al.. Chrisw80 (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * (EC) Delete as nothing at all suggesting the necessary improvements and I myself nearly tagged it as A7. SwisterTwister   talk  05:21, 27 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.