Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Justice Work (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Re-userified (non-admin closure).

This article was AFD'd in March and the result was userify. A few days ago, the original creator of the page, User:Toomanyairmiles, moved it back to mainspace without the required improvements discussed at the AFD. This was discussed with the editor, and apparently the editor would like to keep working in it in User space. The editor did a direct move of the article out of mainspace. This left a redirect from mainspace into userspace, which was CSD'd.   13:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Make Justice Work
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deleted PROD per WP:PROD (previous AFD exists). Concern noted in PROD (by User:ConcernedVancouverite) was: ''Result of AFD was to userfy pending more GNG citations after letting it have some time. Those have not been added, yet the article has been moved back into mainspace. It appears those additional citations have not materialized, and as such this fails WP:GNG.'' Also see comments here: Illia Connell (talk) 22:57, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Cameron11598   (Talk)  00:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Cameron11598   (Talk)  00:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Cameron11598   (Talk)  00:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Need more feedback from User:Toomanyairmiles, see our conversation here. I am getting the impression that the problem with this article is the scope of what Toomanyairmiles wants covered.  Toomanyairmiles keeps pulling sources that describe the "Community or Custody Inquiry" work product of MJW, and not the MJW organization itself.  I suggested to Toomanyairmiles to consider changing the scope of what is to be written about from MJW to the CCI work product.    03:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.