Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Penis Fast

Add to this deletion debate

Description of spam text, not particularly interesting or informative. Fuzheado 01:13, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - someone trying to increase hits on a web page... my guess - Texture 02:49, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - that doesn't deserve to be in an ecyclopedia. Keep - Initially, I thought it was something made up, but it exists on Google.TheBam 03:13, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see why it doesn't deserve to be here. It would be less interesting and less informative if it were gone. Everyking 06:17, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I agree with Everyking. Lupin 09:30, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment - this is just a joke. Is it a notable joke, or an obscure one? I've never heard of it before. Average Earthman 12:17, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bad enough getting spam like this in email. I guess it was inevitable it would start here too. No evidence in the article that it's a notable joke, it's just a rather obvious joke with wings because it appeals strongly to a few, including the anon who posted it here. On the Internet that's all it takes. Andrewa 19:43, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Taku 05:34, Mar 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Cyrius | (talk)  06:28, Mar 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. --pne 16:20, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not sure why this wasn't deleted immediately upon its creation. Moncrief 04:22, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * Whether or not you believe this is worthy of keeping, it's clearly not worthy of speedy deletion. Is it nonsense or known to be false? I vote keep, btw. Meelar 03:32, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - ;Bear 00:19, 2004 Apr 2 (UTC)
 * Keep. Mkweise 14:50, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Note also that the article has been substantially improved since most of the "delete" votes above were cast. Look at the current version and reconsider your votes. Mkweise 15:55, 4 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: Agree it has improved, from being spectacularly substandard to being simply substandard. None of the changes change my vote or the arguments that support it I'm afraid. And I would expect my vote above to still count without this comment. This may not be an ideal process, but it's the process as I understand it. Andrewa 10:00, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've never heard of it, and to be honest, it seems quite stupid. PMC 20:27, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's informative on the subject at hand, whether you consider that subject worthy of your personal perusal or not. prat 00:57, 2004 Apr 6 (UTC)
 * Joke neither very famous nor funny. Delete, or replace with serious information about how to make penis fast.  +sj+ 05:00, 2004 Apr 6 (UTC)
 * No, no! The proper title for that would be Penis acceleration. Mkweise 15:50, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)