Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make a mountain out of a molehill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 23:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Make a mountain out of a molehill

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Transwikied dictionary defenition. Post-transwiki PRODing removed. TexasAndroid (talk) 14:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep:This article is short now, but there is always room for expansion. That is what Wikipedia's stub concept is all about. There is plenty of information that can be added in the future, and it does not have to be added today. This article is in a category called "English idoims," which has many similar articles. Hellno2 (talk) 14:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Additional comment: This article has already had something added to it since I last checked yesterday Hellno2 (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have quite a few articles on similar phrases at Category:English idioms, and this is likely as subject to expansion as the ones we have articles on already.  I am curious now as to where this phrase comes from. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep seems perfectly reasonable to me, useful information. RMHED (talk) 17:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I have created similar style articles on English idioms. After similar concerns were addressed (but without a proposal for deletion), I managed to expand them by adding sections on origin, examples, popular culture, and more. I may be able to do the same for this article through research, should it be kept. As Ihcoyc|Smerdis of Tlön suggested, it would be a good idea to write about the origin. I am curious too. Shaliya waya (talk) 01:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES as a notable idiom. Bearian&#39;sBooties (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.