Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make limstone in your own kitchen!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  05:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Make limstone in your own kitchen!

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Contested prod. Heimstern Läufer 01:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOT. hateless 02:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, also per WP:NOT. Limestone isn't even spelled right. --Havocrazy 02:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, "4. Instruction manuals"  T ennis  Dy N ami T e  (sign here) 02:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It provides no context to the instructions. Even with proper context the instructions would not be encyclopedic, but there is no effort made to make this a satisfactory article. Leebo 86 02:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unencyclopedic, sections are short and lack content, article violates WP:NOT.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 03:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete! JuJube 03:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete wikipedia is not an instruction manual Benon 05:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:SNOW. Part Deux 05:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. Philippe Beaudette 05:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or speedy per WP:SNOW. Instructions in article are needlessly complicated, considering that the process actually starts with limestone. Very weird article. --N Shar 06:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Realkyhick 09:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW Dave 10:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Very confusing and oddball article with not much use, it seems to be repeated in the 'talk' section. Jamesbuc
 * Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW--Boookabooo 10:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT, WP:SNOW. Terence Ong 10:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I tried this recipe.  I broke a tooth. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Totally pointless article. It says to make limestone, take some limestone, add water, remove the water by drying it, end product limestone! Jules1975 16:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete although the concept of making limestone (step 1: get some limestone) has given me a great money-making idea: making diamonds in my own kitchen (step 1: get some diamonds). Hmm, maybe I didn't think it through... Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Deletenon-notable recipe. But it was delicious and refreshing. Way better than the old recipe: "Put the limstone in the coconut, and drink them both together" Edison 17:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete as highly unencyclopedic and per WP:NOT. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 21:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as textbook Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.-- danntm T C 21:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, as wikipedia is not a how-to guide, also lacks content in the various sections. ~ Arjun  22:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.  S .D.   ¿п?  § 00:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Make deletion of how to guides per WP:NOT in your own Wikipidia! --TeckWizTalk Contribs@ 00:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete CSD A1 applies here. GizzaChat  &#169; 10:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * BJAODN, maybe next time they could put up a recipe for a nice limestone parfait... --Candy-Panda 13:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into BJAODN because while this doesn't deserve its own article, it is pretty funny! SuperDT 23:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak transwiki, give the author a chance to improve it at Wikibooks, and if unimproved, delete &mdash;siro&chi;o 09:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, cool info but... it doesn't belong here unfortunately. Do support the idea of transwiki though. Mathmo Talk 09:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm jumping on the pile. I submitted it to BJAODN per Candy Panda.  YechielMan 20:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.