Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makida Moka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 19:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Makida Moka

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article fails WP:GNG & WP:NACTOR She has not been discussed in-depth by reliable sources and a Google search for her leads only to her social media applications. I say a strong delete is best applicable here Celestina007 (talk) 03:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  07:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  07:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

There is No indepth converage from Nigerian reliable sources about her or her "supposed" career. I propose it be deleted & be re-created when She has received more "significant coverage" from reliable sources as WP:GNG Celestina007 (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as per nominator this article fails GNG and NACTOR. Donald1659 (talk) 01:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Exactly what said & From continued research on subject of our discussion we see an WP:TOOSOON situation, failing very woefully as per WP:SIGCOV. She is mentioned very briefly  in  a reliable Nigerian media source I'm aware of this fact,  but that's just that. A mention isn't justification enough for a stand alone article. Let us use the analogy ; "Billy, an upcoming actor is dead" Etc. & thats just that.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Subject of article does not possess primary qualifications to prove true notability as there is no true significant coverage of her as per WP :GNG or WP:SIGCOV she is barely mentioned in passing. It is as though a fan of hers oblivious of Wikipedia polices and guidelines on notability created this page. A delete is best appilcable, a rough but subtle way of determining notability of an individual is through a Google search of which only links to her social media accounts are provided  as results & brief mentions. I say a delete is to be made until she truly becomes notable & worthy of a stand-alone article on the encyclopedia. Celestina007 (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.