Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makin' This Boy Go Crazy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Makin' This Boy Go Crazy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sourcing found for the EP proper, as it was digital-only. The song has at least one review which may suggest notability for the song, but I have found nothing on the EP. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 *  Keep - Article now has fourteen sources, and talks about BOTH singles in detail. Using a "top down approach", if single "Makin' This Boy Go Crazy" is notable, if that is Dylan Scott's song, and this is the only album of his that contains the tune, then the album is probably notable.  An album is in fact, a collection of songs.  If the album article cannot be kept, then it should be merged into Dylan Scott.  Furthermore, the album has placed on two charts. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * None of the sources is about the EP itself though. They're all either about the song, about "Mmm Mmm Mmm", or about Dylan's full album. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:25, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 *  Reply -, I do not disagree that the articles only talk about the two songs. However, the album is a collection of songs.  Reviewing multiple songs is equivalent to reviewing the album.  A top down approach would imply that if the song can have an article, then either the album or the artist can also have an article in place of the song article.  The album article is sizeable anyway.
 * BTW, is anyone going to comment at Articles for deletion/Bebe & Bassy Tour? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * By the way, "reviewing multiple songs is equivalent to reviewing the album" is a completely inaccurate statement. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 18:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The 'EP' isn't notable - there doesn't seem to be any significant coverage of it and the chart positions don't make it notable. Aside from that there is barely any information that isn't duplicated from the article on the singer. --Michig (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 *  Comment - The EP is notable, has five sources covering two songs, which is 40% of the entire album, a section can be written describing the music video, and there is currently no article about the songs to date. Additionally, there is no good reason to delete the article instead of merging or keeping it. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.