Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Making fuller Use of Money

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:08, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

Making fuller Use of Money
Nonsense, if not quite patent nonsense. -Fennec (&#12399;&#12373;&#12400;&#12367;&#12398;&#12365;&#12388;&#12397;) 21:53, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, if not quite a speedy delete: personal essay, original research. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:26, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Personal commentary, non-encyclopedic, original research. Binadot 23:55, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This isn't the first time he's done this, see Votes_for_deletion/Freeing_Money_Constraints. --foobaz&middot;&#9998; 00:03, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Make fuller use of the delete function. RickK 00:45, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Megan1967 01:31, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this inept original research ASAP. Wyss 02:18, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, probably should have been deleted. Tuf-Kat 07:14, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advocacy and consider any similar postings by Mr. McGillis as recreated deletia. Gazpacho 08:54, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Those "false fiscal indoctrinations" sound painful. As is this article.  Delete.  Edeans 07:08, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete essay, original research, spam, scam, and a partridge in a pear tree. --Deathphoenix 04:56, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.