Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makuta Teridax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. consensus is delete, despite a mass-used comment whose veracity has been questioned. StarM 17:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Makuta Teridax

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article asserts zero notability through reliable sources, and is simply an in-universe repetition of the plot section of various Bionicle articles. as such, it is duplicative and trivial, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I have to agree. This article was uneeded in the first place, and the author failed to cite any sources. It has to go. --&#91;&#91;User:Tutthoth-Ankhre&#124;Tutthoth-Ankhre~ The Pharaoh of the Universe&#93;&#93; (talk) 14:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NOT and WP:V as an article consisting entirely of plot summary with no references whatsoever and no assertion of notability. --IllaZilla (talk) 20:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol keep vote.svg|15px]]Keep as article asserts notability through reliable sources should not be deleted. It has to stay per WP:FICT.--63.3.1.1 (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? There is not a single source presented in the article. Your claim is entirely false, and the article completely fails WP:FICT, not to mention WP:V and WP:NOR. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.