Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maléfices


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article has been improved since nomination. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 12:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Maléfices

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article appears non-notable, having been uncited since its creation in 2012. It is poorly linked and I've had to remove a couple anyway as not relevant to the subject. One of the few that remains Tarot de Maléfices which is its own Tarot pack and is also up for deletion. Bermicourt (talk) 11:41, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 March 31.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 11:55, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:02, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - In case any of these helps at all... The Le GROG page could be used to reference basic information. This book, Jouer avec l’Histoire might be useful but is not available on Google books. This paper discusses the game somewhat. This book does have some significant discussion. BOZ (talk) 14:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep While the article currently is completely lacking secondary sources, the mentioned book, Game Magic (pp. 253-255), and the commentary in this French magazine Chroniques d'Altaride, p. 37, together fullfill the minimum required with regard to notability. Together with the other secondary sources already provided by, they can be used to improve the article to a reasonable standard. (I wonder if there are some reviews of the individual products somewhere...). Daranios (talk) 09:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I've added some sources listed by BOZ, and removed some excessive detail. If anyone has access to Jouer avec l'Histoire, it would probably add greatly to this article. Guinness323 (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per Daranios and Guiness323. BOZ (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.