Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malý u Mlázov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mlázovy. Joyous! | Talk 20:55, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Malý u Mlázov

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not pass WP:NGEO criteria. A historically and geographically insignificant fish pond with an area of less than 1 ha and no reliable sources. FromCzech (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Czech Republic. FromCzech (talk) 14:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, I am writing to vote for keeping the article on the English version of Wikipedia.
 * The article meets the notability criteria set by Wikipedia. According to the notability guideline for geographic features, "a feature is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." In the case of "Malý u Mlázov," the pond has a long history, dating back to at least 1783 when a mill was located underneath it. This historical significance has been documented in a source cited in the article, which meets the criteria of a reliable, independent secondary source. Therefore, the pond is a notable feature and deserves its own article on English Wikipedia.
 * Additionally, the article is informative and provides valuable information about the pond, including its location, shape, and history. This is in line with Wikipedia's goal of providing free, high-quality information to readers around the world. By providing information about the pond, the article is fulfilling this goal and contributing to the overall body of knowledge on English Wikipedia.
 * Furthermore, the article does not violate any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. It is well-sourced and does not contain any original research or promotional content. It is a neutral, factual description of the pond and its history, and does not contain any subjective or biased statements.
 * In conclusion, I believe that the article "Malý u Mlázov" should be kept on English Wikipedia. It meets the notability criteria, provides valuable information, and does not violate any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Petr35571 (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I wasnt able to find resources metioning more than statistical data. Juandev (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, the article does not violate any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. It is well-sourced and does not contain any original research or promotional content. It is a neutral, factual description of the pond and its history, and does not contain any subjective or biased statements.
 * In conclusion, I believe that the article "Malý u Mlázov" should be kept on English Wikipedia. It meets the notability criteria, provides valuable information, and does not violate any of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines. Petr35571 (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I wasnt able to find resources metioning more than statistical data. Juandev (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I wasnt able to find resources metioning more than statistical data. Juandev (talk) 17:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge to Mlázovy, verifiable geographical data, but not notable enough to create a standalone article. Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 08:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge per Vejvancicky. Jdcooper (talk) 19:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.