Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malabika Sen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by Nominator. The article has been developed in a very short period such that this discussion has become unnecessary. No opinions expressed except by the creating editor and the nominator (non-admin closure) Fiddle   Faddle  09:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Malabika Sen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:V. The references are all passing mentions, though one does manage two paragraphs, but the others are substantially shorter. One is a video of her. At least one is a billing of a then upcoming performance, thus primary. Her voice work fails WP:MUSIC and I do not see her dance work as passing WP:ENTERTAINER Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle   Faddle  07:39, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

WITHDRAWN by Nominator about to be self closed. Fiddle  Faddle  09:36, 11 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Its very unfair to ignore the tag that its placed under construction and moving it to AfD without WP:BEFORE. The person passes clearly WP:ENT and WP:GNG with WP:RS. I have not completed adding none of her TV soap opera roles (only copied from some article template). Give me some time. Run n Fly (talk) 07:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Run n Fly it was your decision to take this from your sandbox and create it as an article, despite the fact that you are familiar with WP:AFC where it would have been protected against an immediate deletion process, and you would have been given feedback. This process runs for seven days, giving you ample opportunity to make such improvements as are possible and may save this article. Fiddle   Faddle  08:23, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Timtrent But you ignored the tag under construction. Anyways, I will complete it vey soon. Run n Fly (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Run n Fly bring the completed work to my attention. I will reconsider at that point and, if no other editor has opined to delete I will withdraw this nomination if appropriate. If I do not withdraw it I will give reasons for not doing so  Fiddle   Faddle  08:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
 * @Timtrent OK Run n Fly (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep as per above Run n Fly (talk) 07:43, 11 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.