Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malacca Folks Art Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 22:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Malacca Folks Art Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. could not find any significant in depth coverage. LibStar (talk) 18:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Another 8 references have been added. One of the reference describes every single detail about the gallery completely (http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2008&dt=0704&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Selatan&pg=ws_01.htm), one reference describes its exhibition (http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2008&dt=0704&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Selatan&pg=ws_02.htm) and another reference describes its activity (http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2008&dt=1007&sec=Selatan&pg=ws_04.htm). More information of the gallery also have been added (e.g. purpose, detail address, more detail history (who inspired, opening date, officiating date), add exhibition section, add architecture detail section of the building, add activities section, add the info that the gallery is free of charge for its entrance etc). I've taken the photo of its building exterior, and I would also like to add the photo of its interior exhibition. Too bad, no photos were allowed to be taken inside the gallery. Of course I need to stay away from this. Chongkian (talk) 17:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * the address and the fact it has free entry has no bearing on notability. LibStar (talk) 16:55, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm just adding whatever related info I can find regarding the gallery (and any other articles that I've written). Chongkian (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:41, 5 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacks third-party coverage. Sources currently in the article are not reliable. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:37, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * All of those references I've written are all from the third party coverage (not by the gallery itself), and they are the national online newspaper of Malaysia (for sure you can't get any other more reliable than this source). Chongkian (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.