Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 10:02, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Malaun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTDICTIONARY, just picked up some speculative news items and shape them into a wiki article.. The sources included are not broad coverage of the term. Just trivial mentions in some statement by people and the author of the article hugely misinterpreted the sources to write the article. Rahat (Message) 14:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: Invalid argument. The usage of the term as a slur has been documented for a long time. BengaliHindu (talk) 14:50, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * — Note to closing admin: BengaliHindu (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. Kolbasz (talk) 21:10, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Message) 15:26, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Message) 15:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Message) 15:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Deleted. per nom. –  nafSadh did say 00:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * there does not seem to be any  basis for a speedy delete.  DGG ( talk ) 18:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The term seems to be quite circulated.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom Happiest persoN (talk) 19:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's an ugly, ESL-written article, but the topic is a notable slur. Pax 03:03, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - While Wikipedia is not a dictionary, this topic appears to be notable. It is a well-sourced article that demonstrates notability/significant coverage. I see potential for expansion especially on the "impact" section and it's not like the article consists merely of dicdef. &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 03:42, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.