Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malena Morgan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Malena Morgan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Recreation of deleted page. Fails PORNBIO and the GNG as before. Only material change is that subject received award nominations in 2014, which is enough to defeat G4, but clearly is not enough to pass PORNBIO. Promotional text, no independent reliable sourcing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 19:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 27 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Nominated for All-Girl Performer from AVN, nominated for XBIZ Award, role in the latest film by Zalman King, Penthouse Pet of the Month and Twistys Treat Of The Month - enough to leave.--Кориоланыч (talk) 21:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not better satisfying the applicable notability, nothing else convincing.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt as fails everything. Spartaz Humbug! 23:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete insufficient notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails both PORNBIO and GNG guidelines. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 18:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets - Without having done a large amount of research on the subject under consideration here, there does not appear to be enough notability for a stand-alone article at this time. Guy1890 (talk) 06:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * OK--Кориоланыч (talk) 21:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: not notable.VanEman (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.