Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik & the O.G's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Malik &

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to meet Wikipedia's WP:NMUSIC policy. It seems to have been created and largely edited by a WP:SPA which edits articles to do with Malik Al Nasir and has a highly promotional tone and it's largely a list of minor events attended. Cantab12 (talk) 10:33, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Keep. Although spoken word poetry does not have huge mainstream presence, it is a very important art form. Although it looks like all the article contributions came from one source, that doesn't negate the fact that the sources are well listed, credible and noteworthy especially for those in the spoken word community. The inclusion of this subject will be a informative addition to the spoken word reference in wikipedia. Djhero2099 (talk) 17:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as this seems minimally acceptable sourced. SwisterTwister   talk  06:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Keep. It "Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians," Namely Orphy Robinson and Cleveland Watkiss — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.245.92 (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.