Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mallavoodoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 23:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Mallavoodoo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete No claim of notability under WP:BAND. There are no independent sources referenced in the article, and the only substantial Google results I could find were a band website, and a listing on Last.fm. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  —Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment My French skills allows me a limited understanding of Portuguese and I have added two cites, one from the Pernambucano music conservatory and another from a Portuguese language Jazz site, eJazz, about them headlining a festival gig. It is my understanding that they are a significant band in Pernambuco (with Brazil unquestionably home to one of the world's most vibrant jazz scenes). Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've also added a bylined news cite from Universo Online on the release of their 2001 album, O Inverno e a Garça. I acknowledge that their absence from the Portuguese Wikipedia raises doubts. Maybe some Brazilian editors here can shed some light. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep With these added WP:RS I believe the article now meets the first criteria for WP:BAND. The article creator has also added two refs (one of which appears to be more of a mention in passing). But I think we do have the multiple significant coverage needed, now. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Now that there have been several articles added, I would agree that it meets the criteria under WP:BAND. Inks.LWC (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.