Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mallory Jameson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:51, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Mallory Jameson
This article is unverified and unverifiable. The IMDB page is completely empty. She does not occur in the credits of what she claims to be in. The image is of the same person as was on the pages Christina Ritter and Christina Marie Ritter, which is weird. The only ghit which isn't a Wikipedia mirror is about a 3rd grade honor roll student, hardly a claim for notability. Delete. Mak (talk)  18:06, 3 June 2006 (UTC) From my research, I found that the picture that you claimed was the same from Christina Ritter’s to Mallory Jameson’s is titled Tina's Cute pics! 039.jpg. And looks like this: However, Mallory Jameson’s picture is titled Youngerheadshot.jpg and is not the same image. Also they look similar, but you can tell they are two different people. Mallory is obviously around 12 years old, and Christina much older, probably around 16 or 17. The picture of the older girl has smaller eyes, a bigger nose, and no lips hardly, whereas the opposite with the younger girl. The only thing that seems truly similar about them is the shape of their eyes and their wavy hair. Besides, many people look alike and have no relation at all. That's why there's celebrity etc look alike contests. Again, not supporting it, but just for the future realize those little details you ignored. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.163.119.188 (talk • contribs).
 * Delete, unverifiable and non-notable. --Coredesat 18:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources + no google hits = DELTEEATED! Wickethewok 20:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete google gave me 4 hits two of which were from wikipedia. Obviously not notable.-- A n d e h 20:47, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if it were true and verifiable, an actress with one appearance on an episode of Zack and Cody wouldn't make the grade. But let's face it, it isn't true or verifiable. Fan1967 23:40, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * ConsiderLook, I’m not really defending this, but there are a few things you have overlooked.
 * Comment There are a number of other photos of the same person on that website, and they look extremely similar, and there are other similarities between the two articles, but that is not the issue, the issue is that this person is non-notable and unverified. Mak (talk)  19:58, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Let's add a few other issues: First thing User:Annette fleming did after registering was try to get Christina's article unprotected. The anonymous edit above, as well as an earlier attempt to remove all the delete votes from this debate, and also an edit to the Mallory Jameson article, came from the same Annapolis ISP that was involved in the Christina Ritter episodes. We have the same case of an alleged role in a Disney series, where reliable sources don't list any such person. We have an empty IMDB page with no roles listed yet, somehow, "fans" are already posting on the messageboard, even though that page cannot be reached from the main IMDB site. (When you search for a name on IMDB, it only returns people with credits.) And we have a picture that sure looks a lot like the same girl, despite claims to the contrary. But, as Mak says, the main issue is that absolutely nothing in this article is verifiable, and even if it were, it wouldn't be notable. Fan1967 20:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.