Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malls in Punjab (India)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Malls in Punjab (India)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see how a list of shopping malls is encyclopedic. WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:INDISCRIMINATE Omarcheeseboro (talk) 12:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Please see, similar articles exist in wikipedia, List of shopping malls in the United States and also check Category:Lists. Quality check 12:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)(talk)
 * Keep. Lists are useful and serve to indicate through redlinks articles which ought to be created. -- Eastmain (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm okay with it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:45, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Such lists are finite and verifiable, therefore cannot be termed as indiscriminate pieces of information. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge into List of shopping malls in India--Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to somewhere appropriate if such a place can be found... else Keep. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  00:35, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep But these types of information can be useful sometimes and sometimes grossly misused as spams. Title is keep worthy. -- GP Pande  talk!  10:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.