Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malsution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 23:17, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Malsution

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Shouldn't this belong in the wiktionary?  Btilm  20:59, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam. If it were a real word, then yes it would belong on Wiktionary. However, there are no Google books or groups hits, and the only web hits are Wikipedia. Every instance of the word in the "article" is an external link to a non-notable website that simply frames episodes of a you tube-hosted home-produced series of videos (I guess it's meant to be a sitcom or something like that, but I didn't actually watch the video). Thryduulf (talk) 22:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I agree.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Btilm (talk • contribs) 21:32, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 22:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Neologism -Drdisque (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - the Speedy deletion policy specifically excludes neologisms. Intelligent  sium  review 23:10, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - This is a non-notable, unencyclopaedic neologism and possibly self-promotion.  Intelligent  sium  review 23:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.