Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malta–New Zealand relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Malta–New Zealand relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. even the NZ govt describes this relationship as warm and based on our islands status! LibStar (talk) 15:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:N for the lack of in-depth independent coverage. - Biruitorul Talk 16:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing but the usual reciprocal visits by Prime Ministers etc, which of course take place more-or-less at random. Wuzziest (talk) 08:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * User indef blocked, see ANI thread --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  16:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations task force deletions. – Petri Krohn (talk) 00:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - New Zealand troop were active in the Mediterranean Theatre of World War II. What was their role in Malta? -- Petri Krohn (talk) 00:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Answer who cares? Malta wasn't an independent country then, so it's of vanishing relevance whether anzac's were, or were not, involved in some hypothetical use of anzacs in malta, about which you know nothing about. In fact, no reliable sources discuss this alleged relationship and that's our standard. Clear delete.Bali ultimate (talk) 01:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent coverage evident. Any WWII connection is irrelevant. -- Avenue (talk) 03:33, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Violates not a directory and fails notability. Edison (talk) 06:20, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.