Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malta–Norway relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  15:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Malta–Norway relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not close to being a notable or important bilateral tie, is not commented on often. Norway doesn't even have an embassy in Malta, or vice versa. Punkmorten (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Also listing:


 * Delete - no assertion of notability. Given the number of states in the world, the potential number of combinations is huge so any article needs to clearly establish notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:25, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's not enough information about the tie to write an article. - Mgm|(talk) 22:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - part of a set of similar pages.   Tabletop (talk) 09:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - part of a set of similar pages: no proof that this is anything more significant than, say, Kosovo and Nauru. Nyttend (talk) 16:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * keep this is one of thousands of such articles that state the relationships between any two countries, even when the countries are too poor to afford embassies. There is nowhere else for such foreign relations info in WP and no reason to eliminate it. Hmains (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Norway is rich, they don't have an embassy because having such a relation is not important in the country. The same probably goes for Malta. Punkmorten (talk) 22:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Sandstein   18:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - no independent reliable source to establish notability. There is simply not enough going on between Malta and Norway to have anything to write about.--Boffob (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.