Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malta–Romania relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Malta–Romania relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N; no multiple, independent sources provide in-depth coverage of the topic. That both are EU members is recorded at, well, EU members - and more accurately, as Romania didn't join in 2004, as asserted here. Biruitorul Talk 01:00, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Since they are both EU members, I took a little longer than I usually do with these to try to dig up something, came up empty. Gigs (talk) 01:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to be no coverage of actual bilateral relations, everything is about EU expansion. LibStar (talk) 03:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge How about merging/splitting relevant info to Foreign relations of ... articles for each individual country, thereby avoiding combinations of 203 sovereign countries taken 2 at a time articles like this? Edison (talk) 22:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd ask what is there to merge, they don't even have resident embassies. LibStar (talk) 00:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Information (such as it is) can be merged into the new class of articles, but this specific article is non-notable. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 06:57, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources pertaining to the overall article topic. Non-notable. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foreign relations of Malta which now holds the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Foreign relations of Malta where the content has already been boldly merged. Smile a While (talk) 15:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NOTE Per Aymatth2, the imporatant information in this article has already been moved to Foreign relations of Malta so this has become a pointless, empty argument over a redirect. Ikip (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * pointless, empty argument over a redirect is purely your opinion. LibStar (talk) 03:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The comments here are also opinion. Ikip (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, then redirect per above. Stifle (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since no reliable sources discuss this relationship. I have no objection to a redirect after it's deleted. My experience of making a redirect on these sorts of things without an AFD that comes down "delete" is, ah, that it's not popular. So don't see anything pointless or petty to settling the question of what's to be done with this article right here before us.Bali ultimate (talk) 20:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.