Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malta – Saudi Arabia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm not redirecting this; why Foreign relations of Malta, and not Foreign relations of Saudi Arabia? King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:30, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Malta – Saudi Arabia relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

could not find any real evidence of notable relations. the first article of that search is just 2 academic institutions signing a memo of understanding (rather than agreement). I did find an article of Malta considering closing its embassy in Saudi Arabia which may something about the level of relations. LibStar (talk) 02:45, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Foreign relations of Malta, which now holds the content. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent coverage of the topic stated by the article title. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  19:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to Foreign relations of Malta, at this time it is harmful to delete such articles while heated debates are going on. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 15:04, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NOTE the imporatant information in this article has already been moved to Foreign relations of Malta so this has become a pointless, empty argument over a redirect. Ikip (talk) 22:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Should blocked for editing to deciding for delete an article of bilateral relations. I should request it at notice to the admins.  ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 10:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Blocked, I am curious for what. For not wanting to delete this article and instead redirecting it? - Marcusmax ( speak ) 13:35, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Please continue above conversation on your talk pages. thank you. LibStar (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete since no reliable sources discuss this alleged relationship anywhere. I have no opposition to a redirect but it's a highly implausible search term.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:10, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed there is no harm in the re-direct, and of course if it appears to be useless as time goes on it can always be listed at WP:RFD. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 22:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete then redirect to Foreign relations of Malta. Stifle (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, there are no relations of which to speak really. I wouldn't oppose a delete, but at least merging it would keep (possibly) useful content in the encyclopaedia. Merge to Foreign relations of... HJMitchell    You rang?  22:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable secondary sources adress these relationships. Hipocrite (talk) 04:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, random X-Y intersection article. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:45, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.