Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malthusian Selection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Malthusian Selection
This is a vanity article by aka  about an article he wrote in humanist magazine. Putting my evolutionary biologist hat on, it's patent nonsense. It has not appeared in a peer-reviewed journal, it has not become accepted as part of any sociological theory, and constitutes original research by the author. &mdash; Dunc|&#9786; 12:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 14:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. Kusma (討論) 15:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all the original research from Mr. Coutts; I was going to give him a few days to find a real source before nominating this series myself. Note that beyond the 5 articles nominated today, he wrote Differential replication and Exponentialist, both of which are now redirects to Darwinism and Exponentialism, respectively. --  stillnotelf   has a talk page  15:49, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete OR. Pete.Hurd 17:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. --ScienceApologist 18:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.