Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mama's Gravy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as the article doesn't fulfil WP:MUSIC. &mdash;αlεx•mullεr 20:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Mama's Gravy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable band. Speedying the band member articles which constant mostly of two sentences. - Warthog Demon  03:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep – Based on the information found here .  They can make a claim to some notability  Shoessss |  Chat  16:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Reasonable number of releases, but not on a recognized label (as far as I'm aware). Have received some coverage and appear to have provided music for the film Lineage, and also for Blood Guts Bullets & Octane.--Michig (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  22:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

The result was Keep Happy Editing,  D u s t i talk to me 18:44, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  16:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Not listed on allmusic, no releases on a notable label, local touring only ("played up and down the California coast" according to ), none of the few sources found by Shoessss appear to be substantial -- they fail WP:MUSIC. Jfire (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. However, if it was edited to include the film references that Michig mentions then it should pass, but since the last lot of major editing was done a year ago I doubt this will happen. So delete.   Esradekan Gibb       "Talk" 00:35, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Per WP:MUSIC "if [performed music for a work of media that is notable] is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that page" Jfire (talk) 01:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Props to Shoessss & Michig for the research, but I don't believe that the material turned up is sufficient to satisfy WP:MUSIC. As Jfire points out, mentions in the main article are the usual method of handling that. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.