Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamas & Papas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:30, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Mamas & Papas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Check of notability only showed up articles of recalled products and standard retail links. Rayman60 (talk) 04:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:49, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:49, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep To me this is a well-known UK shop/brand for baby stuff, and newspaper articles about it surely get it past GNG, even though the article desperately needs attention. For example,, , , , ,,, Lelijg (talk) 21:08, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Leljig has provided some pretty good independent sources in that selection, the best ones coming from the Telegraph, Independent and Daily Express. These three sources should be just enough for the article to establish notability. Minima  ©  ( talk ) 07:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Article is now tidied up with added refs. Lelijg (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep an unusual baby produce company in including dads in its name. Appears to have somewhat of a cult following for its products, which is born out by sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.