Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mammoth (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 14:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Mammoth (magazine)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparent spam, like its counterpart Paper Sky. Biruitorul Talk 03:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete all as blatant advertising. Alexius08 (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added an English-language reference which is available through AccessMyLibrary.com. To read the full article, you will need to enter your library card number. Bear in mind that most reliable sources about a magazine published in Japan are likely to be in Japanese. Nonetheless, I think the article now passes the general notability guideline. -- Eastmain (talk) 18:42, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 19:32, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Eastmain, you are once again defending the article against a charge that has not been made. The problem is that it is spam and would require a fundamental re-write to not be spam, the nominator has not even brought up WP:N.If you think you can fix that problem, that's another story. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I made some further edits to the article. If an article's subject is notable, it is better to edit it to remove style problems than to try to delete it. - -- Eastmain (talk) 03:24, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non- notable. According to this online magazine shop, the ranking of the magazine is #1196. Oda Mari (talk) 07:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable spam by COI editor. --DAJF (talk) 09:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.