Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man, Moment, Machine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. 

The result was Keep. &mdash; Caknuck 18:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Man, Moment, Machine (2nd AfD)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Repost and copvio, see 1st AFD below. Samuel 12:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Keep. It's my first article and it's not gonna be perfect. I'm trying to fix it now. Cheers, JetLover (Talk) (Sandbox) 21:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC) 
 * Weak keep. This version is not a copyvio and thus not a repost of deleted material.  The article is in bad need of cleanup and wikifying, but I believe there is sufficient precedent for broadcast television shows to have their own articles.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:15, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Can verify that this isn't a copyvio, but this article is in real need of work.--Blueboy96 15:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep An article (with sources) about a television program. What is the problem here? ~ Infrangible 02:15, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * List elsewhere. If it's a suspected copyright violation, it should be listed at WP:CV, not here.  --Tim4christ17 talk 01:52, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The only reason I can see for this to have even been nominated is deletionists thinking "well, it was deleted once, so obviously it should be deleted again", even though it's been rewritten entirely. Which illustrates the fundamental problem with deleting articles for things like copyvio, instead of taking a minute to remove the copyright violations. It seems to me that unless an article clearly can never become encyclopedic (ie vanity articles, attack articles, etc), AfD should be a last resort. Unfortunately, it's all too often used as the first resort. &mdash; Red XIV (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep whatever it was before, it's a good article now. Lists of episodes are universal for all major television fiction series, and the same should apply to nonfiction programming. DGG 08:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. A stub about a TV program on a non-obscure network. Any concerns about copyright or cleanup should be addressed in a different setting. Slic e NYC (Talk) 20:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It is about television program and has sources, I don't see a problem. oysterguitarist~Talk 05:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedily deleted as copyvio, not to mention spam --Steve (Stephen)talk 23:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Man, Moment, Machine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fancurft, reads like an advertisment, hard to fix, only source is officail site. Samuel 20:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio of History.com and as spam (G11). A  ecis Brievenbus 21:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio per above user, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio, and spam of the program. ---Hirohisat 22:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.