Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man bash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Man bash

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * I believe this article does not need to be deleted on the grounds that it obviously is about a regional slang term, and therefore very localised in its verifiability. It notes on the reliability page that 'The appropriateness of any source always depends on the context, which is a matter of common sense and editorial judgment.', and so using common sense people should be able to note that the term 'man bash' is reliable and cannot be backed-up by third party sources due to it's regional nature, I myself find this term an exciting insight into the human nature of dialect development.silentcivilian (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2008
 * Delete Fails WP:RS and WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete For all above reasons. -- K u k i ni  háblame aquí 21:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails just about everything. Not salvageable. – ukexpat (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia is not for things made up one day--Boson (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I am willing to make any changes which will enable the page to stay up. Please see my input on the discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peet 12 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I am new to wikipedia, is there nothing i can do/put on the page to make everything said above clear? Willing to moderate.
 * Delete not an article and never will be. To the creator, I recommend your next page come backed with secondary sources.  Sorry. JuJube (talk) 22:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note- Primary sources are always best.  K u k i ni  háblame aquí 22:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Not really. JuJube (talk) 22:36, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing useful here. Deb (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NEO Pete Fenelon (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Peet, you are new by your own admission. Please review all the rules for articles before creating another article in order to avoid situations like this. Use your own user space if you need any help to achieve this. TaintedZebra (talk) 08:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. (I hate to always say that, but pretty much everything has already been noted.) J.d ela noy gabs adds  19:37, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy I would have speedy deleted this. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

ok fair enough delete it i tried to but i dont know how to but do delete it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peet 12 (talk • contribs) 17:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.