Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man of Nature (1979)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete all articles. Mailer Diablo 04:25, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Man of Nature (1979), Man of Nature, The Return of Man of Nature (1982), Man of Nature III (1985), Sexy Dancing, George Humein, Gigaman, Man of Nature IV (1988)
The page is rubbish, and the movie doesn't exist. Good enough reason? Eixo 14:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Edited to add Man of Nature, The Return of Man of Nature (1982), Man of Nature III (1985), Sexy Dancing, George Humein, Gigaman. This appears to be an elaborate hoax. Please suggest evidence of the contrary. -- Krash (Talk) 17:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Edited to add Man of Nature IV (1988). At what point does this become vandalism? -- Krash (Talk) 05:02, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I saw the movie so it exists Abc85 17:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No IMdb listing. All the redlinks should have been a clue, too. Daniel Case 15:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Update: Upgrading my vote to delete all, since other movies are up for nomination. None of the sequels turned up in the IMdB search I did, linked above. Daniel Case 17:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Further update: my vote applies to the newest addition, as reported above. Daniel Case 05:16, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom MLA 16:09, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per Krash's modification to this AfD MLA 18:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It may well. However, if we can't verify this (which is why we searched the IMdb), we can’t put it on Wikipedia. Daniel Case 17:54, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Abc85 19:07, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. The article on the supposed sequel should be looked at too. Capitalistroadster 19:52, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete em all as above. Capitalistroadster 20:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, crank per nom. Kuru   talk  20:40, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, crank(s) per nom. Kuru   talk  23:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, even if it were a movie, it's nn with no IMdb listing --Colonel Cow 21:37, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all as per Krash's changes. --Colonel Cow 21:10, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * And Delete MoN IV as well. Kudos to Krash for his work exposing this fraud. --Colonel Cow 20:56, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all as hoax. -- Krash (Talk) 17:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked for sources for movies and actors. None found. FloNight 17:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Excuse me, but I saw the movie with my own eyes. And look at Man of Nature III. It has a blue linked actress which appeared in other movies. Even though IMDB doesn't list the movie it exists as I saw it. Abc85 19:05, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Check the article on Sexy Dancing: It has an external link
 * Delete all. Ehm, yeah, it's a link to a home video of some high-school kids goofing off. Oh, and Man of Nature III was directed by the main character in Nabokov's Lolita. Gotta like the effort you've put in though. Eixo 22:48, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, none of it is verifiable. It's probably a practical joke. &mdash; ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 00:53, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * But the star in Man od Nature III was Elizabeth McGovern, a well known star of movies. Please check it out. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abc85 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * I'm sorry, but the movie doesn't seem to be verifiable. Can you link to a webpage or name a book that talks about this movie? I don't see the movie here: . &mdash; ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 09:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * AND when you posted this completely ridiculous reference in this article, all your edits lost some credibility. &mdash; ApolloCreed (comment) (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Well the IMDB has a grudge against this movie like it has against Casino Royale (1953). I am here to inform you. &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abc85 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Because the Casino Royale in 1954 was part of a CBS show Climax!, so it wasn't a separate production. Besides, Casino Royale (1954) returns results in Google, unlike any of the names in this hoax. --Colonel Cow 20:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable --rogerd 05:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Straight delete: The problem is knowing when we cross from hallucinations and fantasies to vandalism.  I can't see these as being actual wp:vip matters (can't see my way to blocking), but they're clear hoaxes/lies.  Geogre 16:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.