Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Managed digital allowance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 00:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Managed digital allowance

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Already deleted under CSD A7, G11 and G12 but brought back. Hoping for some consensus. NJA (t/ c)  13:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC) NJA  (t/ c)  13:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: an emerging business practice and management trend. Everybody sing along!  You know the words.... Also, it seems that most of the text has been blanked as a copyright violation.  A glimpse at the history reveals that it was all an essay of original research, containing texts of the "In today's ever-changing world of the future" type: Today’s enterprise workers are more knowledgeable about technology, and more demanding.  Deconstructing this stuff makes me feel young again.  A speedy delete as patent nonsense would be justified. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete also bleh, sources dont confirm use of the word, kinda sorta confirm the concept as best as I can figure it out. WP:NEO, or WP:OR you choose. Bonewah (talk) 21:39, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment This article started out as a pamphlet from Unisys. I advised the user on how to file it through OTRS, and explained that just moving a few words around doesn't make it not a copyright infringement.  As for deletion, yeah, I think it could be deleted as a neologism. Gigs (talk) 02:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Just to note that OTRS has not completed. Ordinarily, this would be deleted today as an unverified copyright permission, but I'll relist it for another week to allow the AfD to close. I think this is important, because copyright infringement is handled easily through permission, but permission will not address other issues. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.