Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Managementese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 00:31, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Managementese

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While I enjoy this kind of content, it's not encyclopedic. It's inherently subjective and editorial. Underpants 15:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment The most objective the article could get is to be a pure collection of published statements like these, i.e. it would have to copy them word-for-word, i.e. in its best form, it would be a copyvio. --Underpants 15:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not exactly a neologism, but not encyclopedic content either. Cool3 (talk) 15:59, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or possibly merge some of them to Marketing speak, which isn't dissimilar. Tonywalton Talk 17:56, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete almost belongs on Uncyclopedia.--Beligaronia (talk) 19:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Humorous, but unencyclopaedic. Bondegezou (talk) 12:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.