Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manaqib-al-Jalila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Manaqib-al-Jalila

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hopeless puff piece and possible hoax. Title of book does not appear anywhere in any of the cited sources, and the only references I can find to it online are mirrors of this page. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Some parts of this article are literally painful to read. G S Palmer (talk) 13:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax I can say for a fact that the comment that it was the best book of fiqh were it not for the scathing remarks isn't about this book - it's about Al-Muhalla by Ibn Hazm, who died literally 900 years ago and long before the supposed author of the supposed book in this supposed article. This is a load of BS and possibly some kind of a joke. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:50, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.