Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manav Gohil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Manav Gohil

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:BIO or WP:ARTIST. The article also does not have an assertion of importance or notability rather than stating that he is a television actor and anchor. Wonders how that will make him notable! No significant coverage in reliable secondary source Being an actor does not by itself provide notability. Also article does not have reliable sources dealing significantly with the subject. Google search proves the claims in the article but not notability for WP. Wikieditindia (talk) 09:48, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep actor played on 13 different TV series (14 if you count CID Special Bureau as a separate series) some of them quite notable. As for coverage, click that "news" link above to find at least 9 recent features in reliable sources, some of which covering him in great length and depth       . For sure, the article needs improvement, but the subject is notable. --Muhandes (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in multiple news outlets, as enumerated by Muhandes. Moswento (talk &#124; contribs) 11:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as it satisfies "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" per WP:Entertainer. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Not only does he pass WP:ENT because of his many notable roles, he has significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 21:56, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per the verifiable assertion of notability that this person "is a television actor and anchor", enough so to meet WP:ENT... and through the enumerated sources showing a meeting of WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:46, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.