Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Cathedral Gardens Subculture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete or merge. Further proposals to merge can be done editorially.  Daniel  10:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Manchester Cathedral Gardens Subculture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No sourced statements, seems to be cruft of some kind Gordo of the Press Club 20:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep It isn't the best well written stub I have made. It sat for six months on Urbis. Please no WP:SNOW on this one. Please give me a couple of days to source it. Mike33 23:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * the movers edit history is here [Kate bot Gorgo of the press club] and Urbis kids get o on any notability rule. I do have a sociological study and 5 manchester newspaper articles. Mike33 23:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 07:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Whispe  ring  11:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge with Cathedral Gardens. Although, any urban public open space will attract juvenile delinquents - the article doesn't explain how these specific delinquents differ from any others. It could safely be deleted, I think. Tevildo 17:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Delinquent is a little harsh, there is a perception that the young people are delinquent and that is discussed in the article. This has already been forked from Urbis last July and I am worried that if it is merged or deleted then it might disrupt Cathedral Gardens or Urbis because some of the edits made to it previously have been very POV pushing.  The article has a notability because as the young people perceive (see the Dr Joanne Massey's study of the area in the ref page) this is the only place where these Goth/Emo kids feel safe. Mike33 17:36, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unencyclopaedic topic, original research, not notable... Cheers, DWaterson 20:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Nothing wrong with this article and I am familiar with the subculture here. For those who do not think writing about an urban area populated by youths just take a look at Harajuku which is an area near a station in Japan where teens gather in a similar fashion. XAndreWx 05:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.