Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester Journal of International Economic Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Manchester Journal of International Economic Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources, not indexed in selective major databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 11:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment The reference and links in the article give no more than catalogue listings, which are no evidence of notability. I am not willing to say "delete", as there may be perfectly good sources which are not mentioned in the article, but if nobody can find better sources then it will have to be a "delete". JamesBWatson (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 9 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ΛΧΣ  21™  19:48, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:10, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. I see few dozen of books citing this journal. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Are they citing the journal's articles or are they discussing / contextualizing the journal itself? FeatherPluma (talk) 16:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication of notability.  Citations to articles published in a journal do not make the journal notable.  If the journal, like most law journals, were published by a law school, I would suggest redirecting to the law school, but "The Journal is independent of any State or institutional affiliation", so no. TJRC (talk) 20:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notablity, scholarly connection, and not a print journal (so unknown circulation). Sorry, but there is nothing to build an article on. SalHamton (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.