Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester United's Digital Marketing Strategy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 00:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Manchester United's Digital Marketing Strategy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only has primary sources, and doesn't look notable enough to have a standalone article. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 19:53, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 00:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge into Manchester United F.C. article appears to fail WP:GNG, also possible WP:SPAM concern. Jay eyem (talk) 01:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  talk  04:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, don't merge - essentially this article says "big company does digital marketing stuff like all big companies do". I don't think it is notable and I definitely don't think it merits inclusion on the main article -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - not even worth merging, non-notable topic. GiantSnowman 09:06, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly not notable, no coverage of this subject outside of primary sources in any real form. Definitely don't merge with the club article. Although from the look of this it's not spam or paid editing, it is fundamentally completely promotional in tone. Fenix down (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Totally unworthy of mention in an encyclopaedia. – PeeJay 14:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable marketing spam. Nothing worth merging into the Man Utd article. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't see how you can call this encyclopaedic, one or two bits were interesting, I see no point mentioning any of it in Manchester United F.C., I would employ that this is not WP:NOTEWORTHY rational on this. Govvy (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think the comments above by other users are entirely fair and this does not meet notability requirements. Dunarc (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.