Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchester greencycle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 00:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Manchester greencycle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, significance is limited to one event (split from Freecyle network) which is already covered in Freecycle and Freegle. daylon124 (talk) 23:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. daylon124 (talk) 23:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. daylon124 (talk) 23:54, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Agreed, does not rise to the level of notability. Drmies (talk) 23:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Catastrophically failed web search for valid sources. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 14:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.