Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandel Cook


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:59, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Mandel Cook

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Author seems to have created one book. JDOG555 (talk) 04:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources and notability not asserted. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Book is important amoung followers of the Bat Creek inscription. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.59.214.186 (talk • contribs) — 68.59.214.186 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, no evidence of notability, coverage in WP:RS not found. -- Kinu  t/c 08:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Book is self published. Note that page was created by WP:SPA. asnac (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: His book is self-published and non-notable. SL93 (talk) 18:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Book is published by POL Publishing. Not self published. But delete the page. I spoke with Mr Cook and he said to delete the page.--Batcreekstone (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: This article was inappropriately deleted as CSD U1 after having been tagged as such by the above editor. It has been restored; trout has been withheld. -- Kinu  t/c 17:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * delete as a lacking sufficient in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:46, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.