Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandviwalla Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 13:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Mandviwalla Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No assertion of notability. MSJapan (talk) 05:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:57, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:09, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO and no indications of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Subject lacks notability. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I'm been doing 11:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The company has been an official distributor of three major films (including blockbuster Waar, that in my books is sufficient grounds for notability.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 15:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CORPDEPTH needs to be satisfied and it doesn't happen here. A company cannot inherit notability from the films it distributed. Among the sources I found, not one had an in-depth coverage of the company. Literally every single source had a quote from an employee which cannot be used to demonstrate notability. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.