Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandy Sanghera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 17:04, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Mandy Sanghera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not see sufficient references for notability. (the article was considerably promotional in an earlier state, but that's been fixed)  DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 8 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. When I was removing the peacockery from the article I checked the sources, and she does seem to be the expert to call when newspapers and broadcasters need info about cultural abuse. Google News gives some more links. On the other hand, she didn't receive any major awards or such, and supporting abuse victims is very noble but doesn't make you notable. I'm a bit on the fence.  Yinta n  21:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment, added women project to article talkpage so participants are notified of this afd. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage is not enough about her for the articles to lead to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I could find lots of mentions of her in news articles, but no significant coverage in independent reliable sources apart from two articles  in the Coventry Telegraph, and I'm not convinced two articles in the same local newspaper are sufficient to meet WP:BASIC. Qwfp (talk) 10:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly meets WP:GNG. Hmlarson (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep She did win a DIVA of color 2016 award, European Inspiring women List & Pride of Coventry and Warwicksire , and Extraordinary Lady’s Awarded  -- but they seem rather minor. Frederika Eilers (talk) 14:43, 19 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.