Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maneer Mirza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  03:37, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Maneer Mirza

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  19:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak keep 6 FC and 4 LA games for a county side makes me think that there will be more coverage offline and locally. I found this which covers his return from injury, and there's a few other bits in a simple search. I think there will be more out there though. Redirect to List of Worcestershire County Cricket Club players a suitable WP:ATD if required. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep 10 qualifying games, 5 of which were in the county championship, and 16 championship wickets, along with a tough luck story of his exit from the professional ranks. Think there will be enough coverage here to pass WP:GNG. DevaCat1 (talk) 12:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lots of trivial/passing mentions, but there is certainly some significant coverage, including over a paragraph dedicated to him in The Times covering his County Championship debut. Meets NCRIC and based on the sources found so far, the presumption of notability afforded by that SNG seems perfectly reasonable. wjematherplease leave a message... 12:32, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Present coverage seems enough to pass this cricketer for WP:NCRIC. Also, As explained above by Wjemather The Times sources can be counted here for GNG too. As per these points he meets GNG and NCRICKET. Grailcombs (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 14:59, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I think WP:GNG's just barely satisfied here so far between the Worcester article and the assumption the Times coverage on his debut works, but everything else appears trivial. Again shows county cricketers without many appearances don't receive large amounts of media coverage as players. SportingFlyer  T · C  18:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Country Championships. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:40, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.