Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mango Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 's careful dissection of the sourcing of this article carries the day. Randykitty (talk) 16:22, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Mango Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the sources in this article are actually about the record label itself, all are trivial mentions. A search found nothing better. Fails GNG. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  07:17, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 08:48, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Keep -- All the soruces are reliable. The source in the reference number 1 from UTV Romania discusses the subject and it is an uthentic and reliable news source. You would not find many sources in English, because most of the soruces are in Romanian. Rgyalu (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - let's first go through the sources. We have this, this and this, which don't even mention Mango Music. Then there's this, which is cruft. Next come this, this, this, this and this -- as the nominator notes, they're passing mentions not actually about Mango; they're also, by and large, of rather dubious quality: blogs, tabloids and quasi-cruft. Finally, there's this, which is basically a press release from when Mango launched. Quote: "We wish the boys success and await many hits from them! We also thank them for the cake, which sweetened the Utv crew's day today." I think that speaks for itself.
 * Given the utter lack of significant coverage as contemplated by WP:GNG, it seems imperative we should delete. - Biruitorul Talk 19:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I am a fan of Romanian music and certainly, their role is evident, especially bringing the new talents to the music industry. Any tag for an improvement will be better than taking down the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.111.130.117 (talk) 08:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:22, 14 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The "keep" arguments so far seem to be arguments to avoid, while the "delete" arguments are thin in numbers.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:59, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 22:34, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.