Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ManhattanitesTheMovie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus, default to keep. A previous (non-admin) closure resulted in a "keep," but there are valid delete comments here so "no consensus" seems a more accurate close, though the effect is the same in the end. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 12:55, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

ManhattanitesTheMovie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unremarkable independent film. Fails WP:GNG. Prod removed by obvious sock of article creator (who also tried spamming his website here). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 22:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 00:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Film's correct title is simply Manhattanites. More comprehensive searches might include search parameters using production and cast.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't this count as enough coverage?  Its what showed up when I hit the Google news search up top.  More could certainly be found, but I think that review is enough.   D r e a m Focus  19:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Profiled in a major film news outlet.-- Pink Bull  01:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and recommend closure. It's very substantially improved from version as of deletion nomination, and the outside review establishes notability. Chutznik (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It needs multiple sources, not just one. Joe Chill (talk) 21:38, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - The film obviously exists but what  it  needs is one strong  review from  a recognised permanent source such as a print media -  and I  haven't been able to  find one. The web sources are blogs which are generally  not  acceptable arguments for notability.--Kudpung (talk) 11:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.