Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifesto: The World. 21st Century


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:49, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Manifesto: The World. 21st Century

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about a phrase in a speech. The author of the speech and the circumstances of its delivery are notable subjects but this speech could be mentioned within either of those articles. There's nothing extra to say about it to justify a standalone article. Wittylama 11:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you Wittylama. Your suggestion that this is a phrase is incorrect. This Page title is the title of a policy framework that has been endorsed by nuclear nonproliferation organizations such as the Parliamentarians for Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament and Unfold Zero and the United Nations Security Council Counter-Terrorism Committee. It is a well established plan recognized by several nations and the United Nations. I hope this helps to clarify this is more than a phrase. It is a policy framework that has acheived worldwide recognition and will be built upon in the years ahead. This Page should not be deleted. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buckeyes678 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kazakhstan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The article's contents, as in its one sentence, already exists at: Nuclear Security Summit. There is coverage but only mentions of the speech interspersed in larger coverage about the summit, and not really focusing on the speech itself. I thought about voting for redirect, but the mention is only at the general article for Nuclear Security Summit and not the 2016 one. The redirect should be to the 2016 if any. Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, Mr. Magoo has this right.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:33, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.