Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifesto: Together Facing the New Totalitarianism (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy.  — fetch ·  comms   01:11, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Manifesto: Together Facing the New Totalitarianism
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable manifesto. This has failed an AFD once before, and I don't think anything has really changed since this article's previous deletion. Thus, I am nominating it for deletion again. Stonemason89 (talk) 00:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to article on issue. The manifesto was reported on in the news media but it is really an aspect of the larger story.Borock (talk) 07:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Dear Sir or Madam, I am totaly opposed against merging this article. The manifest Together_facing_the_new_totalitarianism is definitely a profound  self-contained contribution about secular reasoning from leading secular intellectual. Since years me and a lot of my colleagues at university Vienna use this manifest for teaching, discussions et cetera. Therefore me and my colleaguesare are totally opposed against merging this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erwin.lengauer (talk • contribs) 22:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. Carrite (talk) 03:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or possibly merge. Even if it is merged the option should be open to make this an independent article in the future.  It is just about notable enough to justify this, especially given some of the signatories.Dejvid (talk) 13:25, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * merge with a recommendation agains making it an independent article. Notable signers do not make a notable letter. I note that while Ref 1 is a good reference, the current version of  ref 2, at m is a single sentence, Ref . 3 is just a reprint of the statement, and Ref. 4 & the sentence it references do not discuss the subject of this article, but the underlying cartoons.    DGG ( talk ) 16:52, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.